Server data from the Official MCP Registry
Checks whether an ERC-8004-registered agent is actually alive right now via a real MCP handshake
About
Checks whether an ERC-8004-registered agent is actually alive right now via a real MCP handshake
Remote endpoints: streamable-http: https://erc8004-agent-liveness-325572559480.us-central1.run.app/mcp
Security Report
This is a well-structured MCP server that implements real ERC-8004 on-chain agent liveness verification with appropriate security controls. The code reuses hardened SSRF-resistant functions from a prior security review, validates all external URLs, and properly handles untrusted registration data. Minor findings are present around error handling and configuration validation, but do not represent exploitable security gaps. Permissions align well with the server's stated purpose of on-chain lookups and MCP handshakes. Supply chain analysis found 2 known vulnerabilities in dependencies (0 critical, 2 high severity).
3 files analyzed · 7 issues found
Security scores are indicators to help you make informed decisions, not guarantees. Always review permissions before connecting any MCP server.
Permissions Required
This plugin requests these system permissions. Most are normal for its category.
How to Install & Connect
Available as Local & Remote
This plugin can run on your machine or connect to a hosted endpoint. during install.
Documentation
View on GitHubFrom the project's GitHub README.
ERC-8004 Agent Liveness
Checks whether an agent registered in the real ERC-8004 "Trustless Agents" Identity Registry (Base mainnet -- both the payment and the registry read, see "Chain scope" below) is actually alive right now -- not just that it was registered once. NEXUS candidate #10 -- manual build, not FORGE-generated, same manual-Cloud-Run-asset pattern as candidates #3/#4/#6/#8/#9/#13/#16.
POST /verify-registered-agent {"agent_id": 3}-- $0.10/call.- MCP tool
verify_registered_agentat/mcp, same params -- currently free, see "Known limitations". GET /health,GET /.well-known/agent-card.json,GET /openapi.json(hasx-payment-info),GET /.well-known/402index-verify.txt(402index claim verification file).
What this is (and why registration alone isn't enough)
ERC-8004 is a real, live Ethereum standard for on-chain agent
identity: an agent mints an ERC-721 token in an IdentityRegistry, whose tokenURI points to an off-chain
registration file (JSON: name, description, declared endpoints, active flag, supported trust methods). It
went live on Ethereum mainnet 2026-01-29, with reference deployments on Base mainnet and Base/Ethereum/Linea
Sepolia testnets. Registration is a one-time on-chain action -- a real registered agent can go completely
dark (process killed, domain expired, endpoint changed) while its on-chain record persists unchanged forever.
This asset closes that gap: it resolves the real on-chain registration AND performs a real MCP initialize
handshake against whatever endpoint the registration declares, right now, at call time -- the same
liveness-vs-registration distinction agent-verification-api (candidate #3) already draws for
domain-claimed identities, applied here to on-chain-registered ones.
Grounding (verified live this session, not assumed from any single source)
- Contract addresses, initially from a third-party summary, verified independently via
eth_getCodeagainsthttps://sepolia.base.orgbefore being trusted:IdentityRegistry(0x8004A818BFB912233c491871b3d84c89A494BD9e) andReputationRegistry(0x8004B663056A597Dffe9eCcC1965A193B7388713) both have real, non-empty deployed bytecode. - ABI, pulled from the reference implementation (
github.com/erc-8004/erc-8004-contracts/abis), tested live against 3 real registered agents (agentId1-3) before being trusted for this asset:- Agent 1's
tokenURIresolves to adata:application/json;base64,...URI. - Agent 2's resolves to
ipfs://bafkreiff.... - Agent 3's resolves to a real
https://api.snack.money/agent/.../registration.jsonURL. All 3 of ERC-8004's real URI schemes confirmed working live, not just the one the spec's own examples show.
- Agent 1's
getSummaryrequires a non-emptyclientAddressesarray -- confirmed live (reverts with"clientAddresses required"otherwise). This asset callsgetClients(agentId)first and only callsgetSummaryif that returns at least one address; agents with zero feedback correctly reportfeedback_count: 0without an RPC error.agentId=999999(a real nonexistent token) correctly reverts with a custom error, confirmed live -- mapped toAGENT_NOT_FOUND, not a crash.
MCP handshake engine: reused, not reimplemented
Per the task brief's explicit instruction, _nexus_validate_public_url, _nexus_no_redirect_mcp_http_client,
and _mcp_handshake_check are ported verbatim from manual_assets/agent-verification-api/main.py
(candidate #3) -- same SSRF pre-check, same no-redirect posture (the exact fix applied there after the
2026-08-22 security review found a redirect-based SSRF bypass), same bounded timeout. Not modified beyond the
asset-name constant. This asset's own contribution is upstream of that: resolving an ERC-8004 registration
file (3 URI schemes) and picking a real endpoint out of its endpoints array to hand to that engine.
Chain scope
Unified, as of 2026-09-04. x402 payment settles in real USDC on Base mainnet. The on-chain
IdentityRegistry read -- the actual identity/liveness check -- is now also on Base mainnet, against the
verified IdentityRegistryUpgradeable deployment (0x8004A169FB4a3325136EB29fA0ceB6D2e539a432) -- see
"Mainnet registry corrected" below. ReputationRegistry reads still use the original (Sepolia-verified)
address -- its real mainnet counterpart was not verified this session, see "Pending". This asset still doesn't
expose a caller-selectable chain -- no evidence a buyer needs one for either rail.
Mainnet registry corrected (2026-09-04)
The 2026-09-03 partial revert below was investigating the wrong contract. 0x8004A818BFB912233c491871b3d84c89A494BD9e
is itself the deterministic Base SEPOLIA IdentityRegistry address from erc-8004/erc-8004-contracts's
vanity-address deployment pattern -- it was never the real Base mainnet deployment, which is a different
deterministic address per network. The real Base mainnet IdentityRegistry is
0x8004A169FB4a3325136EB29fA0ceB6D2e539a432: implementation 0x7274e874ca62410a93bd8bf61c69d8045e399c02
verified on Etherscan as IdentityRegistryUpgradeable (exact name match with the reference repo, compiler
v0.8.24+commit.e11b9ed9), ownerOf reads succeed, and a Basescan export shows 25 real Base mainnet
transactions against it (2026-09-04 09:02-10:06 UTC, 25/25 successful: 5x register, 20x setMetadata) --
versus 19 historical transactions against the old address (2026-01-31 to 2026-04-20), 17/19 reverted. Full
verification trail: scripts/verify_mainnet_registry_candidate.py, branch
claude/erc8004-registry-address-verify-u2db8u. ReputationRegistry's real mainnet address was not verified
this session -- left unchanged, see "Pending".
Mainnet cutover (2026-09-03) and same-day partial revert
Originally built and measured on Base Sepolia testnet (x402 payment + registry reads both). Cut over to Base
mainnet same session: x402 settlement moved to the CDP facilitator (create_facilitator_config(), same swap
already applied to ws/live-entity-verification), the payto wallet moved to NEXUS_X402_PAYTO_ADDRESS
(fail-fast env var, no placeholder default), and the registry RPC moved to Base mainnet too, at the same two
contract addresses -- that address reuse across chains was confirmed by the operator directly on Basescan
before the cutover, not independently re-verified from the session that made the code change (no outbound
network access to mainnet.base.org from that environment).
Reverted a few hours later, registry-read side only. Two independent sources (a live eth_call, and
Basescan's own "Read as Proxy" tab) confirmed ownerOf/balanceOf both revert with "execution reverted, no
data" against the IdentityRegistry proxy (0x8004A818BFB912233c491871b3d84c89A494BD9e) on Base mainnet --
while register() against that same proxy demonstrably works (19 real confirmed mint transactions). The
implementation contract behind the proxy on mainnet (0xd53dE688e0b0ad436FBdbDa00036832FF6499234, confirmed
via Basescan's proxy-implementation slot) has no verified source or ABI anywhere on Etherscan/Basescan --
so there's no way to confirm the deployed mainnet bytecode still matches
github.com/erc-8004/erc-8004-contracts (commit b9e466c) the way the Sepolia deployment's bytecode was
originally confirmed (see "Grounding" above). Continuing to call ownerOf/tokenURI/getClients/getSummary
by name against unverified mainnet bytecode risked the exact failure this asset exists to catch, but aimed at
its own buyers instead: a plausible wrong answer (AGENT_NOT_FOUND for a real agent) charged for as if
correct.
BASE_RPC_URL (default https://mainnet.base.org) and _IDENTITY_REGISTRY_ADDRESS
(0x8004A169FB4a3325136EB29fA0ceB6D2e539a432) now both point at the real, verified Base mainnet
IdentityRegistry -- see "Mainnet registry corrected" above. No CDP RPC node pattern exists elsewhere in this
codebase to reuse (checked onchain-activity-index, x402-receipt-verifier, new-x402-listings-feed --
none of them read on-chain data via RPC at all, only x402 payment went through CDP), so this reuses the same
public endpoint and env var name already used once in the original 2026-09-03 cutover attempt. Every
buyer-facing surface (agent-card, OpenAPI descriptions, this README) has been updated to say both payment and
the registry read are Base mainnet.
Pending
Resolved 2026-09-04: the mainnet cutover this section used to say was blocked on decompiling
0xd53dE688e0b0ad436FBdbDa00036832FF6499234 -- that turned out to be unnecessary. That address was never the
real mainnet IdentityRegistry implementation; the real one
(0x7274e874ca62410a93bd8bf61c69d8045e399c02) is independently verified on Etherscan as
IdentityRegistryUpgradeable, and the cutover is done (see "Mainnet registry corrected" above).
Still open, left explicit rather than guessed at:
ReputationRegistry's real Base mainnet address was not verified this session -- reputation reads still use the Sepolia-deterministic address over the now-mainnet RPC, which may be wrong. Needs the same bytecode/implementation-verification treatmentIdentityRegistryjust got before it's trusted._BASE_RPCuses the free publichttps://mainnet.base.org-- no SLA. CDP's own SDK (already a dependency here) ships a "Base Node" RPC endpoint reusing the same CDP credentials already configured for the x402 facilitator (cdp.base_node_rpc_url.get_base_node_rpc_url, verified by reading the actual cdp-sdk source), but switching to it needs an async-startup restructure (today's RPC client is built synchronously at module import) and its plan-tier availability isn't confirmed. Deferred until there's a concrete reliability/cost reason to take that on -- see the comment above_BASE_RPCinmain.py.
Deploy target: Cloud Run
Same pipeline as candidates #4/#3/#6/#8/#9/#13/#16 -- see skills/infra-deploy-ops.
# 1. First deploy -- PUBLIC_DOMAIN not known yet, every real request 421s until step 2.
./scripts/deploy_cloud_run.sh erc8004-agent-liveness manual_assets/erc8004-agent-liveness
# 2. Grab the printed *.run.app URL, then (only if it differs from env-vars.deploy.yaml's guess):
gcloud run services update erc8004-agent-liveness --region us-central1 --project nexus-505016 \
--update-env-vars PUBLIC_DOMAIN=<the-real-domain>
Known limitations (left unfixed on purpose -- CLAUDE.md SS3, no gate without evidence it's needed)
- MCP tool calls are not charged. Same in-process-call pattern as every other manual asset in this codebase.
active: falseshort-circuits toREGISTERED_INACTIVEeven if the endpoint is actually live. Trusts the registrant's own self-declaration over an independent liveness check in that one case -- an agent lying about being inactive (unusual incentive) would be misreported. Accepted:activeis the registrant's own signal by spec design, overriding it would be second-guessing the standard's own field.REGISTERED_UNREACHABLE(the opposite failure mode -- declared active, not actually reachable) is this asset's actual value-add and is NOT similarly short-circuited.- Endpoint selection is a heuristic, not a spec requirement. ERC-8004's
endpointsarray is free-form (anyname); this asset prefersmcp/x402/a2a/web(in that order) and falls back to the first entry. A registration using an unlistednamefor its only real MCP-capable endpoint would still be picked (name matching isn't the only path -- unnamed-preference fallback covers it), but a registration with MULTIPLE endpoints where none of the preferred names points to the live one could reportREGISTERED_UNREACHABLEbased on the wrong endpoint.
- Endpoint selection is a heuristic, not a spec requirement. ERC-8004's
- IPFS resolution uses a single public gateway (
ipfs.io). No fallback gateway -- a registration whose CID isn't pinned/reachable via that specific gateway reportsREGISTRATION_FETCH_FAILEDeven if the content exists on IPFS generally. - No per-caller rate limiting. Fine for a 7-day disposable measurement window.
reputationis a self-reported, ungated, un-staked signal. Any EVM address can callReputationRegistry.giveFeedbackfor anyagentId--feedback_count/average_valueare real on-chain numbers, but nothing stops an agent's own owner from Sybil-feeding themselves. Treat as an unverified signal, not a trust score (this caveat is also in thereputationfield's own description in the API schema, not just here).
Quality gate (2026-08-23, from design not retroactive)
Same 2-agent process as candidates #3/#4/#6/#8/#9/#13/#16 (security lens; functional+quality+buyer-experience lens), run before the first deploy. Real findings, all fixed before going live:
- Security (0 exploitable findings): confirmed the 3 functions ported verbatim from
agent-verification-api/main.py(_nexus_validate_public_url,_nexus_no_redirect_mcp_http_client,_mcp_handshake_check) carry the actual SSRF-redirect fix, byte-for-byte, and that the newhttps:///IPFS registration-fetch path applies the same defense one layer earlier, before any endpoint is extracted -- confirmed NOT to reintroduce that bug class. Two low/informational items, both addressed as defense-in-depth even though neither was a confirmed exploit: IPFS CID concatenation (confirmed live it couldn't escape theipfs.iohost, but now usesurllib.parse.quoteto confine it to a single path segment anyway), anddata:URI base64 decoding (confirmed linear/non-amplifying, no fix needed). - Functional/buyer-experience (1 must-fix, 1 medium, applied): a registration file whose top-level JSON
is a non-object (array/string/number -- registrant-controlled content) passed through as
"ok": Truewith a non-dictregistration, which every downstream consumer (_pick_liveness_endpoint,_classify_verdict, the response body) assumed was a dict -- an uncaughtAttributeErrorbecame an unhandled 500 after x402 payment had already settled. Fixed: both JSON-parse sites in_resolve_registration_filenow reject non-dict results asregistration_not_an_objectbefore returning"ok": True. Also added the reputation gameability caveat (see "Known limitations" above and thereputationfield's own schema description). Two low/nice-to-have items (duplicate-nameendpoint shadowing, unverified field casing on 2 optional registration keys) left as-is -- no evidence yet either matters for real registrations, consistent with CLAUDE.md SS3. - Verified end-to-end against real production data before AND after fixes: 4 real ERC-8004 agent IDs on Base
Sepolia (1, 2, 3, and a real nonexistent 999999) each produced the correct verdict --
REGISTERED_UNREACHABLE(real registration, endpoint doesn't answer MCP),REGISTRATION_FETCH_FAILEDx2 (a real IPFS gateway timeout, and a real deadhttps://registration URL -- both legitimate, not bugs), andAGENT_NOT_FOUND(real on-chain revert) -- plus real reputation data (74 feedback entries from 12 distinct clients on agent 1).
Measurement (candidate #10, 7-day window)
7-day window from 2026-08-23 (real deploy date) -> decision point 2026-08-30. Source of truth:
traffic_events/revenue_events/mcp_call_events (asset_name = 'erc8004-agent-liveness'), not Cloud Run
logs. Day 7: if zero real traffic (filtering crawlers), pause/delete the Cloud Run service
(gcloud run services delete erc8004-agent-liveness --region us-central1 --project nexus-505016).
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to review this server!
More Developer Tools MCP Servers
Git
Freeby Modelcontextprotocol · Developer Tools
Read, search, and manipulate Git repositories programmatically
Fetch
Freeby Modelcontextprotocol · Developer Tools
Web content fetching and conversion for efficient LLM usage
Worldmonitor
Freeby Koala73 · Developer Tools
Live markets, conflicts, country risk, chokepoints, energy, and China decision signals. 90 tools.
Paperclip
Freeby Paperclipai · Developer Tools
Trending hip-hop artist momentum scores across four cultural dimensions.
Toleno
Freeby Toleno · Developer Tools
Toleno Network MCP Server — Manage your Toleno mining account with Claude AI using natural language.
mcp-creator-python
Freeby mcp-marketplace · Developer Tools
Create, build, and publish Python MCP servers to PyPI — conversationally.
