Back to Browse

Invoicein Examples MCP Server

FinanceLow Risk10.0MCP RegistryRemote
Free

Server data from the Official MCP Registry

XRechnung, Factur-X, Peppol, FatturaPA, KSeF → EN 16931 JSON + fix hints. Hosted; MIT=examples only

About

XRechnung, Factur-X, Peppol, FatturaPA, KSeF → EN 16931 JSON + fix hints. Hosted; MIT=examples only

Remote endpoints: streamable-http: https://invoicein-api.peculiar.systems/mcp

Security Report

10.0
Low Risk10.0Low Risk

Valid MCP server (1 strong, 1 medium validity signals). No known CVEs in dependencies. Imported from the Official MCP Registry.

5 tools verified · Open access · No issues found

Security scores are indicators to help you make informed decisions, not guarantees. Always review permissions before connecting any MCP server.

Permissions Required

This plugin requests these system permissions. Most are normal for its category.

file_system

Check that this permission is expected for this type of plugin.

env_vars

Check that this permission is expected for this type of plugin.

HTTP Network Access

Connects to external APIs or services over the internet.

How to Connect

Remote Plugin

No local installation needed. Your AI client connects to the remote endpoint directly.

Add this to your MCP configuration to connect:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "io-github-peculiar-systems-invoicein": {
      "url": "https://invoicein-api.peculiar.systems/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Documentation

View on GitHub

From the project's GitHub README.

InvoiceIn — examples

MCP server rated A on Glama Run in Postman

Any European e-invoice a business receives → one canonical EN 16931 JSON, a validation report with plain-language fix hints, a PDF, CSV or DATEV export. One stateless endpoint, nothing stored.

Accepts: XRechnung (UBL and CII), EN 16931 UBL 2.1 Invoice/CreditNote, Peppol BIS Billing 3, CII D16B, ZUGFeRD 1.0 / 2.x and Factur-X hybrid PDFs, Italy's FatturaPA 1.2, Poland's KSeF FA(2)/FA(3).

This repository holds runnable examples, sample invoices you can test with, and the MCP registry manifest. The service itself is not open source.

Nothing you send is stored: the document is parsed in memory and the response is built from it. Privacy (full policy) · Terms

The bridge in bridge/ is a transparent proxy, not a second implementation: it mirrors whatever tools/list returns from the hosted server, so the two can never drift. The five tools and their annotations — all read-only, non-destructive, idempotent, closed-world — are in bridge/tools.json, checked by tests/. A static analyser reading the bridge source alone sees one dispatch callback and no tools; that is the proxy, not the tool surface.

60 seconds

curl -X POST "https://invoicein-api.peculiar.systems/v1/invoice?include=validation&lang=en" \
  -H "X-Api-Key: $INVOICEIN_KEY" \
  -F file=@samples/factur-x-en16931.pdf

No key yet? Leave the header out: 20 invoices a day per IP, same output. A trial key (100 invoices, 30 days, no card) comes from the product page.

The response (full example):

{
  "ok": true,
  "source":  { "syntax": "UBL", "format": "peppol-bis3", "profile": "Peppol BIS Billing 3.0", "container": "xml" },
  "invoice": {                         // canonical EN 16931, field names carry BT/BG numbers in /v1/schema
    "document": { "id": "Snippet1", "issue_date": "2017-11-13", "type_code": "380", "currency": "EUR", "due_date": "2017-12-01", ... },
    "seller":   { "name": "SupplierOfficialName Ltd", "vat_id": "GB1232434", "electronic_address": { "value": "9482348239847239874", "scheme": "0088" }, ... },
    "buyer":    { ... },
    "lines":    [ { "id": "1", "quantity": 7, "unit": "DAY", "net_amount": 2800, "tax": { "category": "S", "rate": 25 }, "item": { "name": "item name" } }, ... ],
    "tax_breakdown": [ { "taxable_amount": 1325, "tax_amount": 331.25, "category": "S", "rate": 25 } ],
    "totals":   { "line_net": 1300, "charges": 25, "net": 1325, "tax": 331.25, "gross": 1656.25, "due": 1656.25 },
    "payment":  { "means_code": "30", "remittance_info": "Snippet1", "credit_transfers": [ { "iban": "IBAN32423940", "account_name": "AccountName", "bic": "BIC324098" } ] }
  },
  "validation": { "valid": true, "errors": 0, "warnings": 0,
                  "rule_sets": [ { "id": "XSD:ubl-invoice" }, { "id": "EN16931-UBL", "version": "EN 16931 validation artefacts 1.3.16" }, { "id": "Peppol-UBL" } ],
                  "issues": [] },
  "timings_ms": { "detect": 0.5, "map": 14.4, "validate": 86.0, "total": 100.8 },
  "credits": { "mode": "key", "remaining": 99 }
}

When something is wrong, every failed rule carries a hint in the requested language (example, KSeF FA(3) in Polish):

{ "id": "XSD-UNEXPECTED-ELEMENT", "severity": "error", "rule_set": "XSD:fa3",
  "message": "Element '{http://crd.gov.pl/wzor/2025/06/25/13775/}Adnotacje': This element is not expected. Expected is one of ( {http://crd.gov.pl/wzor/2025/06/25/1 …",
  "hint": "XML zawiera element, którego schemat nie dopuszcza w tym miejscu. Nazwa elementu jest błędna, element należy do innego profilu/wersji (np. UBL 2.0 lub ZUGFeRD EXTENDED), jest zdublowany albo jest własnym rozszerzeniem. Usuń go lub zmień jego nazwę.",
  "who": "sender", "location": "/*/*[4]/*[8]", "line": 43 }

Endpoints

CallReturns
POST /v1/invoice?include=validation,html,pdf,csv,datev&lang=en|de|pl|it|freverything in one JSON (extras base64/inline)
POST /v1/parsecanonical JSON only
POST /v1/validatevalidation report only
POST /v1/render.html · POST /v1/render.pdfhuman-readable rendering, labels in the five languages
POST /v1/export.csv?level=lines|documentsflat CSV
POST /v1/export.datev?skr=03|04&creditor_account=70000DATEV Buchungsstapel (EXTF 700, cp1252)
GET /v1/formats · GET /v1/rules/{id}?lang=de · GET /v1/schemaformats + rule versions · explain a rule id · field guide

Body: multipart field file, or the raw XML/PDF. Send a real User-Agent (Cloudflare rejects the default Python-urllib one with error 1010). Auth: X-Api-Key or Authorization: Bearer. One invoice = one credit whatever outputs you request; a file that carries several invoices (a FatturaPA lot) costs one per invoice. Remaining credits come back in X-Credits-Remaining.

Examples in this repo

Sample invoices

FileWhat it isSource / licence
samples/xrechnung-3.0-ubl.xml, samples/xrechnung-3.0-cii.xmlthe same XRechnung 3.0 invoice in both syntaxesKoSIT XRechnung testsuite, Apache-2.0
samples/peppol-bis3-base-example.xmlPeppol BIS Billing 3 base exampleOpenPeppol, Apache-2.0
samples/factur-x-en16931.pdfFactur-X hybrid PDF, EN 16931 profileZUGFeRD corpus (FNFE-MPE examples), Apache-2.0
samples/ksef-fa3-przyklad-1.xmlKSeF FA(3) official example no. 1Polish Ministry of Finance, public
samples/fatturapa-fpr01.xmlFatturaPA 1.2 official example FPR01Agenzia delle Entrate, public

Both XRechnung files produce the same canonical JSON (only the syntax-specific extensions block differs) — that is the point of the canonical model.

What it does not do

No OCR (a PDF without embedded XML is rejected with pdf-no-xml). Not a Peppol access point, not a French PDP, not a KSeF or SdI client: it reads what you already received and never transmits anything. Factur-X/ZUGFeRD profiles below EN 16931 (MINIMUM, BASIC WL, BASIC) get schema and arithmetic checks only, because the EN 16931 rules would only produce noise there. Validation results are informational, not legal advice.

Licence

The examples in this repository are MIT. Sample invoices keep the licences listed above.

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first to review this server!