Server data from the Official MCP Registry
Codex GSFA — the FAO/WHO General Standard for Food Additives (CXS 192-1995).
About
Codex GSFA — the FAO/WHO General Standard for Food Additives (CXS 192-1995).
Remote endpoints: streamable-http: https://gateway.pipeworx.io/codex-gsfa/mcp
Security Report
Valid MCP server (1 strong, 1 medium validity signals). No known CVEs in dependencies. Package registry verified. Imported from the Official MCP Registry. Trust signals: trusted author (1935/1937 approved). 1 finding(s) downgraded by scanner intelligence.
51 tools verified · Open access · 2 issues found
Security scores are indicators to help you make informed decisions, not guarantees. Always review permissions before connecting any MCP server.
Permissions Required
This plugin requests these system permissions. Most are normal for its category.
What You'll Need
Set these up before or after installing:
Environment variable: PIPEWORX_API_KEY
How to Install & Connect
Available as Local & Remote
This plugin can run on your machine or connect to a hosted endpoint. during install.
Documentation
View on GitHubFrom the project's GitHub README.
@pipeworx/codex-gsfa
The FAO/WHO Codex General Standard for Food Additives (GSFA, CXS 192-1995) — which food additives may be used in which foods, at what maximum level, under which conditions.
Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1863+ live data sources. This is an independent, unofficial integration — not affiliated with, endorsed by, or published by the upstream provider.
Tools
| Tool | Answers |
|---|---|
gsfa_check_use | Is INS 461 permitted in cooked fish, and at what level? — the question the standard exists to answer |
gsfa_search_additive | Resolve an INS number, name, or synonym to its GSFA entry |
gsfa_additive_provisions | Every food category one additive is permitted in |
gsfa_food_category_additives | Every additive permitted in one food category |
gsfa_search_food_categories | Find a GSFA category number by name or number prefix |
gsfa_notes | Resolve the numbered notes that condition a provision, or search them by wording |
gsfa_coverage | What this dataset holds and how current it is |
Two kinds of permission
GSFA grants use in two structurally different ways, and every provision returned says which one it came from:
- Table 1 & 2 (
provision_table: "table1_2") — a specific maximum use level, either numeric (10,000 mg/kg) orGMP, usually conditioned by numbered notes. - Table 3 (
provision_table: "table3") — the additive is permitted under good manufacturing practice with no numeric limit.
For methyl cellulose that is 17 Table 1/2 provisions against 61 Table 3 ones. Treating them as one thing either invents limits the standard does not set or hides most of where an additive is actually allowed.
Subcategory inheritance
A GSFA provision applies to the food category named and all of its
subcategories — a provision on 01.4 also governs 01.4.4. Lookups walk up
the numbering and report inherited_from_parent plus matched_food_category,
because "permitted at this level for this exact food" and "permitted because its
parent category is" are different answers.
permitted: false means the standard lists no provision. That is not the
same as an explicit prohibition, and the response says so rather than implying
a ban.
Notes are part of the answer
Provisions are frequently qualified by numbered notes — "for use in ready-to-drink products only", "as sulphur dioxide", "on the fat basis" — and a maximum level is not fully specified without them. 2,590 of 15,377 provisions carry one.
Note text is inlined on every provision (notes: [{id, text}]), not left as
a bare id, because an id with no text invites a caller to read the level and
stop. gsfa_notes resolves ids directly or searches note wording.
The text is scraped from the note icon's tooltip on each additive page, so it carries the same Codex session as the additive it qualifies. All 468 cited note ids resolve.
Auth
None. The dataset ships inside the pack.
Freshness
Every additive result carries cac_session, cac_year, and snapshot_date.
Records come from archived snapshots of GSFA Online, so individual additives can
lag the newest Codex session — gsfa_coverage reports which sessions are
present and which additive ids could not be retrieved at all (entries whose
every archived snapshot is one of FAO's own error pages).
Regenerate with:
node --experimental-strip-types scripts/ingest-gsfa.ts
Data sources
- Codex GSFA Online — https://www.fao.org/gsfaonline/ (FAO fronts this with a
Cloudflare managed challenge; we read Internet Archive snapshots instead —
see
docs/codex-gsfa-plan.mdfor the route and the freshness plan) - Codex Alimentarius CXS 192-1995 — https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-texts/dbs/gsfa/en/
- JECFA specifications and evaluations, which GSFA links to for toxicological data — https://apps.who.int/food-additives-contaminants-jecfa-database/
Quick Start
Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):
{
"mcpServers": {
"codex-gsfa": {
"url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/codex-gsfa/mcp"
}
}
}
What this endpoint actually serves
tools/list at https://gateway.pipeworx.io/codex-gsfa/mcp returns the tools in the table
above plus the shared Pipeworx meta-tools — ask_pipeworx,
discover_tools, search_within, remember/recall and the rest of the
gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a
single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the
pack's own. The connection's initialize response states its exact scope, and
is the authoritative answer for a given day.
This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a
scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via
ask_pipeworx, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a
second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without
them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth,
connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.
Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed directly, instead of just this one's:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pipeworx": {
"url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp"
}
}
}
Both URLs reach the same gateway and the same 1863+ data sources. The
only difference is which pack's tools are listed directly; ask_pipeworx
reaches all of them from either one.
No MCP client? Call it over HTTP
curl -X POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/gsfa_check_use \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"additive":"461","food_category":"14.1.5"}'
No account needed for the first calls. Inspect any tool: GET https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/gsfa_check_use. Find one: POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/search_packs with {"query":"..."}.
Run it from npm
@pipeworx/mcp-codex-gsfa is a local stdio bridge to the Pipeworx gateway: your MCP client
starts it with npx, and it forwards every call to the same
https://gateway.pipeworx.io/codex-gsfa/mcp endpoint shown above. It needs network access;
there is no offline mode.
{
"mcpServers": {
"codex-gsfa": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@pipeworx/mcp-codex-gsfa"]
}
}
}
Without a key it calls anonymously, capped at 50 calls a day. A free account
raises that to 200 a day: get a key at https://pipeworx.io/signup and add
"env": { "PIPEWORX_API_KEY": "<your key>" } to the server entry.
The key is sent as a Bearer token, the same way a hosted connection sends it,
so calls are metered and billed exactly as they are there.
It lists only this pack's tools by default. Set PIPEWORX_META_TOOLS=1 to
also list ask_pipeworx and the other gateway-wide tools.
Behind an HTTPS proxy: Node's built-in fetch does not read HTTPS_PROXY by
default. Newer Node releases honour it when NODE_USE_ENV_PROXY=1 is set; check
your Node version's documentation.
Using with ask_pipeworx
Instead of calling tools directly, you can ask questions in plain English — this works on the pack endpoint above as well as on the full gateway:
ask_pipeworx({ question: "your question about Codex Gsfa data" })
The gateway picks the right tool and fills the arguments automatically.
More
License
MIT
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to review this server!
More Developer Tools MCP Servers
Rea
Freeby Morluto · Developer Tools
Reverse engineer anything from your terminal or agent with one CLI and MCP server.
Paperclip
Freeby Paperclipai · Developer Tools
Trending hip-hop artist momentum scores across four cultural dimensions.
Fetch
Freeby Modelcontextprotocol · Developer Tools
Web content fetching and conversion for efficient LLM usage
Git
Freeby Modelcontextprotocol · Developer Tools
Read, search, and manipulate Git repositories programmatically
Toleno
Freeby Toleno · Developer Tools
Toleno Network MCP Server — Manage your Toleno mining account with Claude AI using natural language.
MCP Marketplace
Freeby mcp-marketplace · Developer Tools
Search and install MCP servers from inside your AI client.
