Server data from the Official MCP Registry
Texas Attorney General opinions — statute-citation search over recorded
About
Texas Attorney General opinions — statute-citation search over recorded
Remote endpoints: streamable-http: https://gateway.pipeworx.io/texas-ag-opinions/mcp
Security Report
The Texas AG opinions MCP server is keyless, read-only, and fetches only texasattorneygeneral.gov content plus its own Pipeworx gateway, with permissions matching its purpose. The only notable items are best-effort regex parsing of PDFs and a documented inability to perform full-archive search, which are quality limitations rather than security defects. Code shown appears to be a shared helper library with sound error handling and SSRF-aware URL checks. Supply chain analysis found 1 known vulnerability in dependencies (0 critical, 1 high severity).
3 files analyzed · 5 issues found
Security scores are indicators to help you make informed decisions, not guarantees. Always review permissions before connecting any MCP server.
Permissions Required
This plugin requests these system permissions. Most are normal for its category.
How to Install & Connect
Available as Local & Remote
This plugin can run on your machine or connect to a hosted endpoint. during install.
Documentation
View on GitHubFrom the project's GitHub README.
@pipeworx/texas-ag-opinions
Texas Attorney General opinions since 1939: look up a specific opinion by number (full text, requestor, cited statutes), check whether it has a recorded overruled/modified/affirmed/withdrawn status, and search that status index by statute citation.
Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1721+ live data sources. This is an independent, unofficial integration — not affiliated with, endorsed by, or published by the upstream provider.
Tools
tx_ag_opinion_lookup(opinion_number)— the AG, date, requestor, RQ- request number, topic categories, one-sentence summary, full opinion text, and statute citations found in it (best-effort regex over the opinion PDF). Also includes the opinion's own subsequent-treatment status if it has one.tx_ag_opinion_status(opinion_number)— whether a specific opinion has a recorded overruled/modified/affirmed/superseded/withdrawn entry in the AG's own courtesy index.not_listeddoes NOT mean the opinion is still good law — the AG's own page says the list may be incomplete.tx_ag_statute_search(citation)— search the ~381 opinions with a recorded subsequent-treatment entry for one mentioning a given statute citation or keyword. PARTIAL CAPABILITY — see "Data sources" below for exactly what this does and does not cover.
Auth
Keyless.
Data sources
- https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opinions — landing page listing all
16 Attorneys General since 1939 with their exact opinion-number range (e.g.
"GA-0001 - GA-1096"). Scraped once (2026-10-07) into
TX_AG_RANGESinsrc/index.ts— this is howtx_ag_opinion_lookupandtx_ag_opinion_statusturn a bare number into the right AG slug without guessing. - https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opinions/{ag-slug}/{number} — one
opinion's own page (e.g.
/opinions/ken-paxton/kp-0537): AG name, topic categories, one-sentence summary, and a link to the opinion PDF. Fetched live, never baked. - https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/{year}/{number}.pdf
— the opinion's full text. Verified text-based (not scanned):
extractPdfText(shared/src/pdf-text.ts) parses it cleanly with zero warnings. Requestor name/title/address, the RQ- request number, the one-line question, and cited statutes are all regex-extracted from this text — best-effort, not a real citation parser (a multi-section cite like "§§ 51.031, .034" only captures the first section; non-"TEX. ... CODE §" citation styles, e.g. to federal law or by "Art." instead of "§", are not captured). - https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opinions/opinions-overruled-modified-affirmed-withdrawn
— ONE page listing every opinion (381, captured 2026-10-07) the AG's Opinion
Committee has flagged as later overruled, modified, affirmed, superseded, or
withdrawn, with the citing statute or case. Baked into
src/tx-ag-status-data.ts(~38KB — comfortably under the few-hundred-KB threshold that would require KV baking, so this stays a plain module-scope import, unlike the state-code packs with much larger tables). This index is what backs bothtx_ag_opinion_statusandtx_ag_statute_search.
What this pack cannot do, and why
/opinions/{number} WITHOUT the AG slug is a trap. It returns HTTP 200
for ANY number, real or fabricated — verified live: a real opinion (kp-0537)
and a made-up one (kp-9999) come back byte-for-byte the same size, because
the slug-less path is a generic "ajax-individual-opinion" form stub that says
"Invalid Attorney General name in URL", not the opinion. The correctly
AG-qualified path 404s properly on a bad number. This pack always resolves
the AG slug from TX_AG_RANGES first and never fetches the slug-less path.
Full-text statute-citation search across the whole archive (~19,000
opinions back to 1939) is NOT available. The site's own opinion search box
is a Cludo widget (api-us1.cludo.com, customerId 10000129, engineId
10001310) that renders results entirely client-side after a signed API call —
confirmed live: every call shape tried (GET, POST, with/without Origin and
Referer headers) returns 401 {"Message":"Authorization has been denied for this request."}. tx_ag_statute_search instead searches only the baked
overruled/modified/affirmed/withdrawn index (381 opinions) for a citation or
keyword appearing in the text describing what superseded each one — useful
for "has this been overruled by a later statute," not for "which opinions
discuss this statute" in general. Every response from that tool states this
limitation in a coverage_note field.
Cloudflare JS challenge under load. The site is Cloudflare-fronted and
answered a "Just a moment..." challenge page (not the real content) to one of
this pack's own research requests after ~15 rapid sequential fetches. Both
live-fetching tools detect this (isCloudflareChallenge) and throw a loud
upstream_down: error naming it, rather than silently parsing the challenge
page as if it were real content.
Quick Start
Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):
{
"mcpServers": {
"texas-ag-opinions": {
"url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/texas-ag-opinions/mcp"
}
}
}
What this endpoint actually serves
tools/list at https://gateway.pipeworx.io/texas-ag-opinions/mcp returns the tools in the table
above plus the shared Pipeworx meta-tools — ask_pipeworx,
discover_tools, search_within, remember/recall and the rest of the
gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a
single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the
pack's own. The connection's initialize response states its exact scope, and
is the authoritative answer for a given day.
This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a
scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via
ask_pipeworx, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a
second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without
them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth,
connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.
Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed directly, instead of just this one's:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pipeworx": {
"url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp"
}
}
}
Both URLs reach the same gateway and the same 1721+ data sources. The
only difference is which pack's tools are listed directly; ask_pipeworx
reaches all of them from either one.
No MCP client? Call it over HTTP
curl -X POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/tx_ag_opinion_lookup \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"opinion_number":"KP-0537"}'
No account needed for the first calls. Inspect any tool: GET https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/tx_ag_opinion_lookup. Find one: POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/search_packs with {"query":"..."}.
Standalone (no gateway account)
This package also runs as a local stdio MCP server — no Pipeworx account, no gateway round-trip:
{
"mcpServers": {
"texas-ag-opinions": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@pipeworx/mcp-texas-ag-opinions"]
}
}
}
Or run it directly to confirm it starts:
npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-texas-ag-opinions
It speaks MCP over stdin/stdout and answers initialize/tools/list/tools/call
for only this pack's tools — none of the shared meta-tools the gateway
connection above adds. Same source, same tools, no ask_pipeworx routing.
Using with ask_pipeworx
Instead of calling tools directly, you can ask questions in plain English — this works on the pack endpoint above as well as on the full gateway:
ask_pipeworx({ question: "your question about Texas Ag Opinions data" })
The gateway picks the right tool and fills the arguments automatically.
More
License
MIT
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to review this server!
More Developer Tools MCP Servers
Git
Freeby Modelcontextprotocol · Developer Tools
Read, search, and manipulate Git repositories programmatically
Fetch
Freeby Modelcontextprotocol · Developer Tools
Web content fetching and conversion for efficient LLM usage
Worldmonitor
Freeby Koala73 · Developer Tools
Live markets, conflicts, country risk, chokepoints, energy, and China decision signals. 90 tools.
Paperclip
Freeby Paperclipai · Developer Tools
Trending hip-hop artist momentum scores across four cultural dimensions.
Toleno
Freeby Toleno · Developer Tools
Toleno Network MCP Server — Manage your Toleno mining account with Claude AI using natural language.
mcp-creator-python
Freeby mcp-marketplace · Developer Tools
Create, build, and publish Python MCP servers to PyPI — conversationally.
