Back to Browse

Rowstile MCP Server

Developer ToolsLow Risk9.7MCP RegistryLocal
Free

Server data from the Official MCP Registry

Check, test, prove and review a rowstile policy: access rules for Postgres row-level security

About

Check, test, prove and review a rowstile policy: access rules for Postgres row-level security

Security Report

9.7
Low Risk9.7Low Risk

Valid MCP server (1 strong, 1 medium validity signals). No known CVEs in dependencies. ⚠️ Package registry links to a different repository than scanned source. Imported from the Official MCP Registry. 1 finding(s) downgraded by scanner intelligence.

14 files analyzed · 1 issue found

Security scores are indicators to help you make informed decisions, not guarantees. Always review permissions before connecting any MCP server.

Permissions Required

This plugin requests these system permissions. Most are normal for its category.

HTTP Network Access

Connects to external APIs or services over the internet.

Shell Command Execution

Runs commands on your machine. Be cautious — only use if you trust this plugin.

How to Install

Add this to your MCP configuration file:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "io-github-rowstile-rowstile": {
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "rowstile"
      ],
      "command": "npx"
    }
  }
}

Documentation

View on GitHub

From the project's GitHub README.

rowstile: access rules in a policy file, enforced by Postgres

Authorization inside your Postgres. Sharing, groups, nested folders and tenants, written in one policy file and compiled to row-level security. There is no authorization service to run beside the database, and no permission data to copy into one and keep in step: the rules read the tables your app already has.

A policy, its tests, a one-word change and what the review says of it, a refused write that says why, and what would grant it

Write who-can-do-what in one small file, next to the data it depends on. The rowstile command compiles it into plain SQL: views, trigger-maintained tables for inheritance, row-level security policies, and functions for app code: checks, sharing, "who has access", "why", access requests, reviews, audit. Each change to the policy ships as a migration for the tool your app already uses (Alembic, Prisma, Drizzle Kit, plain SQL). Nothing is installed in the database first, and nothing has to run next to it: any Postgres 16, 17 or 18 works, managed or not, and the owner of your tables runs the migrations, no superuser needed.

app role app_user                               -- the Postgres role the app connects as
type user = app.users
type folder = app.folders
  owner  : user   = owner_id                    -- a relation read from a column
  parent : folder = parent_id
  editor : user   = app.folder_editors(folder_id -> user_id)   -- ... or from a link table
  can edit = owner or editor or parent.edit     -- inherited down the tree
  can view = edit
rules app.folders
  select : view
  update : edit

The app says who is asking in each transaction and queries its tables as usual; RLS filters every read and checks every write:

BEGIN;
SELECT authz.act_as('user', '42');         -- a trusted backend, or:
-- SELECT authz.login_key('ak_...');       -- an API key (optionally limited by scopes)
-- SELECT authz.login_jwt('eyJ...');       -- a JWT from your identity provider
SELECT * FROM app.folders;                             -- only the folders 42 may view
SELECT authz.can('folder', 7, 'edit');                 -- ask directly
SELECT * FROM authz.perms_of('folder', ARRAY['7', '8']);  -- a list's buttons, in one call
COMMIT;

Is it for you?

It fits when:

  • your app's data is in one Postgres database;
  • who may see or change a row depends on other rows: its owner, the members of a team (teams inside teams), a folder or a project that passes access down, a tenant, what people share with each other;
  • you were about to add an authorization service and keep it in step with the database, or your hand-written row-level security has become hard to test and to change.

It doesn't when:

  • what decides access is in several databases, or outside Postgres;
  • a browser reads the tables through Supabase's Data API (its roles are not the app role: a backend has to sign in);
  • one tree takes many moves and links a second (they wait for each other);
  • you need an outside audit or a vendor behind it today: rowstile is a 0.x preview with one maintainer.

Status

rowstile is a 0.x preview. Until 1.0, a minor release may change the language, the authz.* functions, the SDKs and the file formats; each release still upgrades a database from the one before it, and the changelog says what to do. What a 0.x release promises.

rowstile was called rowfence until 0.1.0-alpha.1; another product had the name first. The changelog says what to change.

Installing

Only an alpha is published so far, 0.1.0-alpha.7: ask for it.

npm i -D rowstile@next         # the command with its own Python: a TypeScript app needs none
pip install --pre rowstile     # the command and the Python SDK: rowstile[fastapi], [sqlalchemy], ...
docker run --rm -u "$(id -u):$(id -g)" -v "$PWD:/work" ghcr.io/rowstile/rowstile:0.1.0-alpha.7 migrate

npm brings the Python for Linux (glibc and musl, x64 and arm64), macOS (x64 and arm64) and Windows x64. The image runs as root unless told otherwise: -u makes the files it writes yours. Installing has the rest: alphas and release candidates, the extras, the repository.

From this repository, put core/cli on PATH. rowstile init then finds the stack (Next.js, Prisma, Drizzle, FastAPI, SQLAlchemy, Alembic), writes rowstile.toml for its migration tool, adds the SDK's packages and says which line to change.

Docs

This repository

folderwhat
core/the compiler and the rowstile command, their tests and the benchmarks
sdk/the SDKs: Python (FastAPI, SQLAlchemy, psycopg, asyncpg) and TypeScript (Next.js, Prisma, Drizzle, pg, postgres.js, React)
integrations/each SDK's conformance suite: a small app and the checks it must pass
examples/complete apps built on rowstile: a file manager and a messenger
editor/the VS Code and Zed extensions, a Tree-sitter grammar (Helix, Neovim); other editors start rowstile lsp
review-ci/the policy review for pull requests: a GitHub action and a GitLab CI template
docs/the guides and the reference, as Markdown; site/ builds them into the docs site
playground/rowstile in the browser (Pyodide and PGlite)
packaging/how rowstile is installed: npm, PyPI and a Docker image

Contributing

A question, or something you built with rowstile: Discussions. Issues and pull requests are welcome: CONTRIBUTING.md says how a change gets in, and the code of conduct how we work together. What changed in each release: CHANGELOG.md. How releases are numbered and made: RELEASING.md.

Security

rowstile has not been audited by anyone outside the project. The threat model says what it protects and from whom. Report a vulnerability privately: SECURITY.md.

How the project itself is run, as the OpenSSF Scorecard measures it (pinned actions, what each workflow's token may do, known vulnerabilities in dependencies, review, releases): OpenSSF Scorecard

The project's own answers to the OpenSSF Best Practices criteria, at the passing level: how it is documented, changed, tested and secured, each answer with where to check it: OpenSSF Best Practices

License

Apache License 2.0; see LICENSE. Copyright 2026 Salaheddine EL HSSANI.

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first to review this server!