Server data from the Official MCP Registry
Read-only verification evidence for paid machine services and buyer policy checks.
About
Read-only verification evidence for paid machine services and buyer policy checks.
Remote endpoints: streamable-http: https://verify.atinamos.co.uk/mcp
Security Report
Valid MCP server (1 strong, 0 medium validity signals). No known CVEs in dependencies. Imported from the Official MCP Registry.
Endpoint verified · Open access · No issues found
Security scores are indicators to help you make informed decisions, not guarantees. Always review permissions before connecting any MCP server.
Permissions Found in Source Code
Found by scanning the linked source code. This listing connects to a hosted endpoint, so none of this runs on your machine: it describes what the server software does where it is hosted.
How to Connect
Remote Plugin
No local installation needed. Your AI client connects to the remote endpoint directly.
Add this to your MCP configuration to connect:
{
"mcpServers": {
"uk-co-atinamos-evidence": {
"url": "https://verify.atinamos.co.uk/mcp"
}
}
}Documentation
View on GitHubFrom the project's GitHub README.
Atinamos Agent Verification Research
Public research, schemas and technical evidence for Atinamos independent verification of paid AI-agent and machine services.
Human-readable research: https://verify.atinamos.co.uk
Technical evidence: this repository
You can pay to be tested. You cannot pay to be trusted.
Atinamos produces scoped evidence. The buyer decides what that evidence means under its own policy.
Atinamos does not issue a universal trust score, certification, approval, safe/unsafe verdict or permanent provider rating.
Current state — 7 September 2026
Read the canonical public status first:
The main technical milestone is now the first unattended generic external Assurance execution from an already-frozen plan.
Keyronne JSON Repair
service: POST https://keyronne.com/api/json-repair
run: 1b5bc844-368c-445a-8f84-e62be6d88baa
adapter: generic-transaction-fulfilment v1.0
state: PLAN_FROZEN → COMPLETE
spend: 0.001 USDC
One internal production coordinator invocation handled the routine paid execution stages without an operator manually stepping x402 challenge acquisition, payment signing, paid dispatch, settlement observation, fulfilment evaluation or Verification publication.
Independent Base settlement:
transaction: 0xc42bb177c41d21a56e9d3c02546fa8ebeda911cff3bc1139169a61c89f7b495c
block: 50996015
Signed evidence:
atinamos:receipt:10e40afd-f6b1-57bd-9c1e-0a4a1695a428
Observed evidence layers:
PAYMENT SETTLED
FULFILMENT FULFILLED
CORRECTNESS NOT_EVALUATED
QUALITY NOT_EVALUATED
The service returned the advertised kind of JSON deliverable. Atinamos did not infer semantic correctness or quality from that fulfilment.
- Keyronne unattended generic Assurance experiment
- Human-readable record: https://verify.atinamos.co.uk/research/unattended-generic-assurance-keyronne/
Important boundary
The Keyronne run began at PLAN_FROZEN.
It proves:
frozen independent plan
→ real bounded external purchase
→ independent Base settlement observation
→ fulfilment evidence
→ immutable Verification package
→ signed receipt
→ COMPLETE
It does not yet prove the complete public seller journey:
raw seller URL
→ non-spending discovery
→ scope explanation
→ independent frozen plan
→ seller funding
→ durable queue
→ proven Runner
→ signed evidence
That seller product journey is now the main development lane.
Current development priority
PROVEN ENGINE
↓
SELLER PRODUCT
↓
FIRST USERS
↓
REVENUE / MARKET FEEDBACK
Human seller productisation comes first. A later AI-seller API/MCP should use the same underlying Assurance run/order model rather than introducing another execution engine.
Earlier production milestone — IBANforge deterministic commissioning
On 6 September 2026, Atinamos completed the first end-to-end external deterministic commissioning of the current Assurance Runner → Verification publication path against:
POST https://api.ibanforge.com/v1/iban/validate
Two bounded x402 calls were made at 0.005 USDC each. Settlement was independently observed on Base, useful fulfilment returned, and the returned valid field matched independently derived ISO 13616 MOD-97 expectations for one valid and one invalid fixture.
total observed test spend: 0.010 USDC
Base settlements observed: 2
successful fulfilments: 2
independent controls passed: 2 / 2
signed Assurance receipts: 2
That run was human-triggered commissioning. It remains an important earlier milestone and should not be retroactively described as unattended.
Earlier autonomous buyer milestone — Proof #3
On 28 August 2026, an Atinamos-operated bounded buyer was given a task, maximum spend and buyer policy. It independently searched an external x402 marketplace, checked exact-route viability, queried published Atinamos evidence, applied its own policy, selected an external seller without the human naming the seller, made a bounded payment, consumed the result and validated the purchased output.
Final clean run:
selected seller: Keyronne JSON Repair
payment: 0.001 USDC on Base
x402: v2 / exact
paid HTTP: 200
proof3_complete: true
This proves the controlled Atinamos buyer experiment. It does not establish widespread external-agent adoption of Atinamos evidence.
First confirmed external commercial purchase of an Atinamos service
Also on 28 August 2026, Atinamos observed an unrelated external client purchase Atinamos JSON Repair for 0.005 USDC through x402 and receive successful HTTP fulfilment.
This establishes external commercial use of an Atinamos machine service. It does not establish that the purchaser was definitely an autonomous AI agent.
Other published direct evidence
The repository deliberately retains successful and unsuccessful observations, including:
- code402 LEI Check assurance series
- x402Node JSON Repair
- x402.direct Service Directory Search
- x402engine Web Screenshot
See EVIDENCE_INDEX.md for the current consolidated index.
Evidence semantics
Atinamos keeps these evidence layers separate:
PAYMENT
Did payment settle?
FULFILMENT
Did the advertised kind of deliverable return?
CORRECTNESS
Was the returned content independently checked?
QUALITY
Was subjective quality independently evaluated?
Guardrails:
UNKNOWN != UNSAFE
SETTLED != FULFILLED
FULFILLED != CORRECT
CORRECT != HIGH QUALITY
SIGNED RECEIPT != PERMANENT TRUST
SAMPLE COUNT != RELIABILITY PERCENTAGE
Endpoint and HTTP method are material evidence identity where applicable.
Public Evidence MCP
AI agents and developers can query selected published Atinamos evidence through the read-only Atinamos Evidence MCP:
https://verify.atinamos.co.uk/mcp
The MCP exposes published evidence and buyer-supplied policy evaluation. It does not expose wallet access, payment signing, verification-triggering writes or a universal trust verdict.
Public Market Search
Atinamos exposes a bounded read-only projection of machine-service discovery observations:
GET https://verify.atinamos.co.uk/v1/market/search?q=<query>&limit=<1-50>
GET https://verify.atinamos.co.uk/v1/market/service/<service_id>
Market Search reports observed listings and provenance. A market listing is not verification evidence.
Assurance evidence reads
Current signed Assurance evidence can be read using:
GET https://verify.atinamos.co.uk/v1/assurance/receipts/<receipt_id>
GET https://verify.atinamos.co.uk/v1/assurance/evidence?endpoint=<service-url>&method=<HTTP_METHOD>
Endpoint and HTTP method are material evidence identity.
Methodology and specifications
- Evidence & Classification Methodology v1.0
- Public Verification Receipt Specification v1.0
- Public Verification Receipt v1 JSON Schema
- Machine-Evidence Schema Audit — 6 September 2026
Historical evidence should remain valid in the format in which it was issued rather than being silently rewritten.
Repository purpose
This repository is the deliberately sanitised public technical publication layer for Atinamos Verification and Assurance research.
It may contain:
- public evidence schemas;
- sanitised verification receipts;
- methodology suitable for technical scrutiny;
- deliberately published experiment records;
- public research notes;
- machine-interface documentation;
- examples and specifications.
It does not contain:
- Atinamos operational source code;
- private signing/wallet material;
- private infrastructure credentials;
- the private operational database;
- unpublished anti-abuse techniques;
- material that would materially assist gaming of Assurance tests.
GitHub is not where Atinamos Verification runs. It is where Atinamos publishes selected technical evidence and documentation for public scrutiny and machine consumption.
Licensing
Copyright © 2026 MotionFil-AI.
- Research, methodology, written evidence, findings, specifications and datasets are licensed under CC BY 4.0 unless a file states otherwise.
- Schemas, machine-readable receipts/examples and future source code are licensed under the MIT License unless a file states otherwise.
See LICENSE.md for details.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to review this server!
More Developer Tools MCP Servers
Git
Freeby Modelcontextprotocol · Developer Tools
Read, search, and manipulate Git repositories programmatically
Fetch
Freeby Modelcontextprotocol · Developer Tools
Web content fetching and conversion for efficient LLM usage
Worldmonitor
Freeby Koala73 · Developer Tools
Live markets, conflicts, country risk, chokepoints, energy, and China decision signals. 93 tools.
Paperclip
Freeby Paperclipai · Developer Tools
Trending hip-hop artist momentum scores across four cultural dimensions.
Toleno
Freeby Toleno · Developer Tools
Toleno Network MCP Server — Manage your Toleno mining account with Claude AI using natural language.
mcp-creator-python
Freeby mcp-marketplace · Developer Tools
Create, build, and publish Python MCP servers to PyPI — conversationally.
